Resources

Integrating Concrete Masonry Walls With Metal Building Systems

INTRODUCTION

Metal buildings are used extensively for warehouses and other structures requiring large, open floor spaces. Part of their design flexibility comes from the ability to clad metal buildings with a variety of materials to provide different appearances or functions to the buildings. Concrete masonry walls are popular enclosure systems for metal buildings because of masonry’s aesthetic appeal, impact resistance, strength, and fire resistance. The durability of concrete masonry resists incidental impacts from hand carts and forklifts, provides maximum protection in disasters such as earthquakes and hurricanes, as well as superior security, fire resistance, and noise control.

Concrete masonry walls used for metal buildings can include: exterior full-height walls, either with or without a parapet; exterior partial-height or wainscot walls; and interior loadbearing walls or nonloadbearing walls or partitions. Architectural concrete masonry units, such as colored, split faced, burnished, or scored units, can be used to provide an almost limitless array of textures and patterns to the walls. These units can be used for the entire facade or for banding courses to achieve specific patterns or highlight certain design aspects of the building.

A more detailed discussion of the system, along with structural design and construction considerations, is included in Concrete Masonry Walls for Metal Building Systems (ref. 1). The manual is intended to
bridge the gap between the engineer who designs the metal building system and the engineer who designs the concrete masonry walls to unify their respective knowledge.

DETAILS

A typical metal building clad with masonry is shown in Figure 1. Figures 2 – 6 show some typical details used for exterior concrete masonry cladding on a metal building. These details may need to be modified to meet individual design conditions.

Because of the inherent material differences between steel and masonry, careful consideration must be given to accommodating differential movement between the two materials and their assemblies. In Serviceability Design Considerations for Low-Rise Buildings (ref. 2), a lateral drift limit of H/100 for a ten year recurrence wind loading based on main wind force resisting system loads is suggested for low rise buildings with exterior masonry walls reinforced vertically. See Table 12.12.1 of ASCE 7 (ref. 3) for the allowable story drift for seismic loading. Most reinforced masonry walls for metal buildings are designed to span vertically, supported by a steel spandrel at the top and by the foundation at the bottom.

WALL BASE

Because of stiffness and deformation incompatibilities between flexible steel and rigid masonry assemblies, and consequently to control the location of cracking in the masonry walls that may result from relatively larger steel frame deflections at the top of the structure, a “hinge” can be incorporated at the base of the masonry assembly to allow out-of-plane rotation.

Two such hinge connections are shown in Figures 2 and 3. The construction shown in Figure 2 uses through-wall flashing to break the bond at the base of the wall providing a simply supported condition allowing shear transfer but no moment for out-of-plane loading. In many cases the shear force can be adequately transferred by friction through the flashed bed joint. However, it is recommended that a positive shear connection be provided by extending foundation dowels across the joint. It is recommended that the number of bars extended across the horizontal joint be minimized, and that the extension be limited to 2 in. (51 mm), to ensure that the joint will behave as assumed. Therefore, every vertical bar otherwise required for strength at critical sections does not necessarily need to be extended through the joint.

Masonry shear walls are very strong and stiff and are often used to resist lateral loads. However, masonry wall sections used as shear wall segments must have vertical reinforcement continuous into the foundation as shown in Figure 3. Flashing is also incorporated at the floor level to allow the wall some out-of-plane rotation due to building drift. Design aids are included in Concrete Masonry Walls for Metal
Building Systems
(ref. 1) for inplane and out-of-plane reinforced masonry walls as well as for lintels and anchor bolts. Appendix C also presents design examples. As shown in Figure 4, these walls normally span vertically and are laterally supported by a spandrel at the top of the masonry portion of the wall.

When the masonry is designed with a base hinge, it is important to properly detail the building corners to accommodate the movements.

A vertical isolation joint should be placed near the building corner and proper consideration should be given to the masonry and steel connections at corner columns. Flexible anchors and/or slotted connections should be used.

WAINSCOT WALLS

Although full height masonry walls provide the most benefit particularly when the masonry is used for shear walls, partial-height walls, or wainscots, are sometimes used. These walls are commonly 4 to 10 ft (1.2 to 3.0 m) high with metal panel walls extending from the top of the masonry to the roof. The masonry provides strength and
impact resistance for the portion of the wall most susceptible to damage.

COLUMN DETAIL

Figure 5 shows the connection of a rigid frame column to concrete masonry sidewalls with a coincident vertical control joint. The details show vertically adjustable column anchors connecting the wall to the column. For walls designed to span vertically, it is good practice to provide a nominal number of anchors connecting the wall to the column to add stiffness and strength to the edge of the wall. If rigid enough, these anchors can assist in laterally bracing the outside column flange. For larger lateral loads, more substantial connections may be required. Anchorage to end wall columns is very similar.

SPANDREL DETAIL

A typical spandrel detail is shown in Figure Spandrels should be placed as high as possible to reduce the masonry span above the spandrel, especially on walls with parapets. Depending on the rigid frame configuration used, rigid frame connection plates and diagonal stiffeners may restrict the spandrel location. The spandrel is designed by the metal building manufacturer. If the inner flange of the spandrel needs to be braced, the metal building manufacturer will show on the drawings where the braces are required along with the information needed for the masonry engineer to design them and their anchorage to the wall.

Shim plates should be used at spandrel/masonry connections to allow for camber in the spandrel and other construction tolerances (see Figure 6). The steel spandrel should never be pulled to the masonry wall by tightening the anchor bolts.

CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE

Typically, construction of metal buildings with concrete masonry walls proceeds as follows: concrete footing and column placement; concrete masonry foundation wall construction to grade; concrete slab placement; steel erection; and concrete masonry wall construction. Note, however, that this sequence may need to be modified to meet the needs of a particular project. For example, this construction sequence changes when loadbearing end walls are used. In this case, the steel supported by the masonry is erected after the masonry wall is in place.

Coordination between the various trades is essential for efficient construction. Preconstruction conferences are an excellent way for contractors and subcontractors to coordinate construction scheduling and to avoid conflicts and delays.

REFERENCES

  1. Concrete Masonry Walls for Metal Building Systems, CMU-MAN-003-11. Concrete Masonry & Hardscapes Association, Metal Building Manufacturers Association, International Code Council, 2011.
  2. Serviceability Design Considerations for Steel Buildings, AISC Steel Design Guide #3. American Institute of Steel Construction, 2003.
  3. Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, ASCE 7-05. American Society for Civil Engineers, 2005.

Concrete Masonry Screen Walls

INTRODUCTION

Concrete masonry screen walls are used in every part of every country on the globe, on every conceivable style of building, and for a wide variety of purposes. Created originally as a functional building element, the screen wall combines privacy with observation, interior light with shade and solar heat reduction, and airy comfort with wind control for both interior and exterior applications. Curtain walls, fences, sun screens, and room dividers are just a few of the limitless applications for a concrete masonry screen wall. The scope of this TEK focuses on the design and detailing of non-loadbearing concrete masonry screen walls. For loadbearing screen wall applications, users are referred to the applicable engineering analysis provisions of TMS 402 (Ref. 5).

Extra attention to the design of screen walls is warranted because of the relatively high percentage of open area in their face. The open area is created usually by the use of special screen units with decorative openings in their face. Screen walls should be designed to resist wind pressure and seismic forces to which they are exposed to while providing a durable and attractive architectural finish. Strength and stability is provided by: (1) incorporating steel reinforcement (either conventional reinforcing bars, bed joint reinforcement, and/or anchors); (2) limiting the clear span of screen walls; and/or (3) providing a separate support system capable of carrying lateral loads from the assembly to the backup support(s).

MATERIALS

Screen Wall Units – Due to the virtually limitless number of shapes and sizes for concrete masonry screen wall units, designers are encouraged to check on the availability of any specific shape during the early planning stages of a project. Some shapes are available only in certain localities and others may be restricted by patent or copyright. Figure 1 illustrates a general overview of some of the shapes that may be encountered for screen wall design. Note that these unit configurations can come in various thicknesses depending upon availability.

Despite screen wall units being used predominately in onloadbearing applications, they still should be of high quality for their intended construction. At a minimum, concrete masonry units used for screen walls should meet the requirements of ASTM C90, Standard Specification for Loadbearing Concrete Masonry (Ref. 1). Verification of unit properties should be in accordance with ASTM C140, Standard Test Methods for Sampling and Testing Concrete Masonry Units and Related Units, Annex A1 (Ref. 2). Due to their unique configuration full-size testing of screen wall block is not feasible, thus requiring that coupons be removed from the screen wall block for compressive strength testing. The coupon must meet the specimen size requirements of a height to thickness ratio equal to two (2) to one (1) and a length to thickness ratio equal to four (4) to one (1). In some situations, the length requirement for a specimen may not be able to be attained. In these cases, the length should be greater than or equal to the height of the specimen.

When tested in accordance with ASTM C140, screen units must attain a minimum average net area compressive strength of 2000 psi (13.7 MPa) based on three units tested. In addition to the above compressive strength requirements, the recommended minimum thickness of any part of the screen wall unit should not be less than 3/4 inches (19 mm).

Figure 2 presents a visual representation of where the coupon for a given screen block wall unit can be extracted. Per ASTM C140, the height of the coupon must be in the same orientation as the height of the screen block when it is placed.

Further information on ASTM C90, ASTM C140, and concrete masonry units can be found in CMU-TEC-001-23 (Ref. 7), TEK 18 01D (Ref. 16), and TEK 18-02C (Ref. 17).

Mortar – ASTM C270, Standard Specification for Mortar for Unit Masonry (Ref. 3), contains non-mandatory recommendations for the type of mortar to use for various applications. Type N mortar is the recommended type for exterior and interior nonloadbearing walls, which would encompass screen walls.

Alternatives such as Type S or M mortar can be used where the design variable or exposure conditions warrant.

For additional information on mortar, see TEK 09-01A (Ref. 9).

Grout – Grout for embedding steel reinforcement in horizontal or vertical cells should comply with ASTM C476, Standard Specification for Grout for Masonry (Ref. 4).

For additional information on grout, see TEK 09-04A (Ref. 10) and TEK 18-08A (Ref. 9).

Reinforcement and Anchor – Reinforcing steel comes in three different forms for screen walls: 1) Steel wire reinforcement that is prefabricated consisting of cold-drawn wire, 2) reinforcing bars, and 3) anchors. During the design, the designer must be cognizant of the cover and protective coating requirements for the steel. These requirements are largely dependent on the type of weather the screen wall will encounter during the life of the assembly and these requirements may affect the design of the wall.

For additional information on reinforcement steel, see TEK 12-01B (Ref. 12), TEK 12-02B (Ref. 13), TEK 12-04D (Ref. 14), and TEK 12-

06A (Ref. 15).

DESIGN

The design of a screen block wall depends upon a number of factors: function, location (exterior or interior), aesthetic requirements, and provisions of local building codes. They are used extensively for the following types of construction: (1) interior partitions, (2) free-standing walls supported on their own foundations, (3) and enclosed panels in masonry walls or external frames.

Screen wall partitions are designed as non-loadbearing panels with primary consideration given to adequate anchorage at panel ends and/or top edge, depending upon the type of lateral support furnished. Free-standing walls include such assemblies as fences and other exterior non-loadbearing screens that receive lateral stability from a structural frame braced to an adjacent structure or designed as a cantilever from the foundation.

Non-loadbearing screen walls should have a minimum nominal thickness of 4 in. (102 mm). Based on the nominal thickness of the unit and design method to be used, Table 1 was derived to determine the maximum height or length that can be built for a screen wall that has its units placed on a full mortar bed. This chart has been broken down into four separate distinct design categories: (1) Vertically Spanning per Allowable Stress Design (ASD) method, (2) Horizontally Spanning per Allowable Stress Design (ASD) method, (3) Vertically Spanning per Strength Design method, and (4) Horizontally Spanning per Strength Design method.

The use of Table 1 requires the following:

1) The tables assume the wall is either vertically spanning (supported at the top and bottom of the wall) or horizontally spanning and laid in a running bond (supported at the sides of the wall). If the wall is to be horizontally spanning using a bond pattern other than running bond, then the table is not valid and cannot be used.
2) The table assumes the screen wall units are placed on a full mortar bed with no open spaces between units.
3) The wind pressure and seismicity pressure expected to be encountered for the wall must be known.
4) The design pressure can be from either seismic or wind out-of place loading.
5) The screen walls are not designed to carry axial loads other than their own weight and are not part of the lateral force resisting system (shear walls).

Wind and seismic loads are typically the most frequently encountered external force that will interact with the wall. Wind pressures are calculated using the provisions ASCE 7, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures (Ref. 6) for open signs or lattice structures thus taking into account the open area of the screen wall. Seismic forces are also determined in accordance with ASCE 7 for architectural components based upon the installed weight of the screen wall. Based on the calculated loads, the designer should use the higher of the two loads to determine the maximum height to thickness or length to thickness ratio for a given design method.

For example, when building a horizontally spanning screen block wall with nominal 4 in. (102 mm) thick units placed with Type S portland cement mortar in an area that encounters 15 psf (0.718 kPa) wind pressure, the maximum length span of the screen wall is 12 ft (3.66 m) using the ASD method. Determined as follows:

Per Table 1a for a horizontally spanning wall,

Another example, when building a vertically spanning screen block wall with nominal 5 in. (127 mm) thick units placed with Type N portland cement mortar in an area that encounters 40 psf (1.915 kPa) wind pressure, the maximum height span of the screen wall is 6 ft 8 in. (2.03 m) using the Strength Design method. Determined as follows:

Per Table 1b for a vertically spanning wall,

Adequate anchorage should be provided between screen walls and lateral supports, and the supports should be designed to transfer loads to the structure and into the ground. Examples of anchorage of free-standing screens to their supporting framework is accomplished by various means as illustrated in Figure 3, with alternate support conditions shown in Figures 4, 5, 6, and 7. Lateral support may be obtained from cross walls, piers, columns, posts, or buttresses for horizontal spans, and from floors, foundations, roofs, or spandrel beams for screen walls spanning the vertical direction. Consideration should be given to expansion caused by temperature change and by deflection under load when screen wall panels are enclosed in a structural framing system.

CRACK CONTROL

The use of steel reinforcement is permitted where it can be embedded in mortar joints, in bond beam courses, or grouted into continuous vertical cells. Horizontal bed joint reinforcement consisting of two No. 9 gauge wires or equivalent, placed 16 inches o.c. is recommended when screen wall units are laid in stack bond. Horizontal bed joint reinforcement is not required for running bond masonry; however, the use of it helps with crack control in a masonry wall.

Ladder-type joint reinforcement and truss-type bed joint reinforcement are both acceptable forms of joint reinforcement as the reinforcement will lie on a solid face and not interfere with vertical reinforcement.

Control joints can be used at the discretion of the designer to mitigate cracking potential. Figures 6 and 7 illustrate options for supporting screen walls while incorporating control joints. For more information on crack control see, CMU-TEC-009-23 (Ref. 11).

REFERENCES

  1. Standard Specification for Loadbearing Concrete Masonry
    Units, ASTM C90-15. ASTM International, Inc., 2015.
  2. Standard Test Methods for Sampling and Testing Concrete
    Masonry Units and Related Units, ASTM C140-15. ASTM
    International, Inc., 2015.
  3. Standard Specification for Mortar for Unit Masonry, ASTM
    C270-14a. ASTM International, Inc., 2014.
  4. Standard Specification for Grout for Masonry, ASTM
    C476-10. ASTM International, Inc., 2010.
  5. Building Code Requirements for Masonry Structures, TMS
  6. The Masonry Society, 2016.
  7. Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for
    Buildings and Other Structures, ASCE 7. American Society
    of Civil Engineers, 2016.
  8. Concrete Masonry Unit Shapes, Sizes, Properties, and
    Specifications, CMU-TEC-001-23, Concrete Masonry &
    Hardscapes Association, 2023.
  9. Grout Quality Assurance, TEK 18-08B, Concrete Masonry
    & Hardscapes Association, 2005.
  10. Mortars for Concrete Masonry, TEK 09-01A, Concrete
    Masonry & Hardscapes Association, 2004.
  11. Grout for Concrete Masonry, TEK 09-04A, Concrete
    Masonry & Hardscapes Association, 2005.
  12. Crack Control Strategies for Concrete Masonry
    Construction, CMU-TEC-009-23, Concrete Masonry &
    Hardscapes Association, 2023.
  13. Anchors and Ties for Masonry, TEK 12-01B, Concrete
    Masonry & Hardscapes Association, 2011.
  14. Joint Reinforcement for Concrete Masonry, TEK 12-02B,
    Concrete Masonry & Hardscapes Association, 2005.
  15. Steel Reinforcement for Concrete Masonry, TEK 12-04D,
    Concrete Masonry & Hardscapes Association, 2006.
  16. Splices, Development & Standard Hooks for Concrete
    Masonry Based on the 2009 & 2012 IBC, TEK 12-06A,
    Concrete Masonry & Hardscapes Association, 2013.
  17. Evaluating the Compressive Strength of Concrete
    Masonry, TEK 18-01D, Concrete Masonry & Hardscapes
    Association, 2017.
  18. Sampling and Testing Concrete Masonry Units, TEK 18-
    02C, Concrete Masonry & Hardscapes Association, 2014.