Resources

Concrete Masonry Basement Wall Construction

Introduction

Basements allow a building owner to significantly increase usable living, working, or storage space at a relatively low cost. Old perceptions of basements have proven outdated by stateofthe-art waterproofing, improved drainage systems, and natural lighting features such as window wells. Other potential benefits of basements include room for expansion of usable space, increased resale value, and safe haven during storms.

Historically, plain (unreinforced) concrete masonry walls have been used to effectively resist soil loads. Currently, however, reinforced walls are becoming more popular as a way to use thinner walls to resist large backfill pressures. Regardless of whether the wall is plain or reinforced, successful performance of a basement wall relies on quality construction in accordance with the structural design and the project specifications.

Materials

Concrete Masonry Units: Concrete masonry units should comply with Standard Specification for Loadbearing Concrete Masonry Units, ASTM C 90 (ref. 8). Specific colors and textures may be specified to provide a finished interior to the basement. Drywall can also be installed on furring strips, if desired. A rule of thumb for estimating the number of concrete masonry units to order is 113 units for every 100 ft2 (9.3 m2) of wall area. This estimate assumes the use of 3/8 in. (9.5 mm) mortar joints.

Mortar: Mortar serves several important functions in a concrete masonry wall; it bonds the units together, seals joints against air and moisture penetration, and bonds to joint reinforcement, ties, and anchors so that all components perform as a structural element.

Mortar should comply with Standard Specification for Mortar for Unit Masonry, ASTM C 270 (ref. 9). In addition, most building codes require the use of Type M or S mortar for construction of basement walls (refs. 2, 4, 5, 9, 13), because Type M and S mortars provide higher compressive strengths. Table 1 lists mortar proportions.

Typical concrete masonry construction uses about 8.5 ft3 (0.24 m3) of mortar for every 100 ft2 (9.3 m2) of masonry wall area. This figure assumes 3/8 in. (9.5 mm) thick mortar joints, face shell mortar bedding, and a 10% allowance for waste.

Grout: In reinforced concrete masonry construction, grout is used to bond the reinforcement and the masonry together. Grout should conform to Standard Specification for Grout for Masonry, ASTM C 476 (ref. 10), with the proportions listed in Table 2. As an alternative to complying with the proportion requirements in Table 2, grout can be specified to have a minimum compressive strength of 2000 psi (13.8 MPa) at 28 days. Enough water should be added to the grout so that it will have a slump of 8 to 11 in. (203 to 279 mm). The high slump allows the grout to be fluid enough to flow around reinforcing bars and into small voids. This initially high water-to-cement ratio is reduced significantly as the masonry units absorb excess mix water. Thus, grout gains high strengths despite the initially high waterto-cement ratio.

Construction

Prior to laying the first course of masonry, the top of the footing must be cleaned of mud, dirt, ice or other materials which reduce the bond between the mortar and the footing. This can usually be accomplished using brushes or brooms, although excessive oil or dirt may require sand blasting.

Masons typically lay the corners of a basement first so that alignment is easily maintained. This also allows the mason to plan where cuts are necessary for window openings or to fit the building’s plan.

To make up for surface irregularities in the footing, the first course of masonry is set on a mortar bed joint which can range from 1/4 to 3/4 in. (6.4 to 19 mm) in thickness. This initial bed joint should fully bed the first course of masonry units, although mortar should not excessively protrude into cells that will be grouted.

All other mortar joints should be approximately 3/8 in. (9.5 mm) thick and, except for partially grouted masonry, need only provide face shell bedding for the masonry units. In partially grouted construction, webs adjacent to the grouted cells are mortared to restrict grout from flowing into ungrouted cores. Head joints must be filled solidly for a thickness equal to a face shell thickness of the units.

Tooled concave joints provide the greatest resistance to water penetration. On the exterior face of the wall, mortar joints may be cut flush if parging coats are to be applied.

When joint reinforcement is used, it should be placed directly on the block with mortar placed over the reinforcement in the usual method. A mortar cover of at least 5/8 in. (15.9 mm) should be provided between the exterior face of the wall and the joint reinforcement. A mortar cover of 1/2 in. (12.7 mm) is needed on the interior face of the wall. For added safety against corrosion, hot dipped galvanized joint reinforcement is recommended.

See Figures 1-4 for construction details.

Reinforced Masonry: For reinforced masonry construction, the reinforcing bars must be properly located to be fully functional. In most cases, vertical bars are positioned towards the interior face of basement walls to provide the greatest resistance to soil pressures. Bar positioners at the top and bottom of the wall prevent the bars from moving out of position during grouting. A space of at least 1/2 in. (12.7 mm) for coarse grout and 1/4 in. (6.4 mm) for fine grout should be maintained between the bar and the face shell of the block so that grout can flow completely around the reinforcing bars.

As mix water is absorbed by the units, voids can form in the grout. Accordingly, grout must be puddled or consolidated after placement to eliminate these voids and to increase the bond between the grout and the masonry units. Most codes permit puddling of grout when it is placed in lifts less than about 12 in. (305 mm). Lifts over 12 inches (305 mm) should be mechanically consolidated and then reconsolidated after about 3 to 10 minutes.

Surface Bonding: Another method of constructing concrete masonry walls is to dry stack units (without mortar) and then apply surface bonding mortar to both faces of the wall. The surface bonding mortar contains thousands of small glass fibers. When the mortar is applied properly to the required thickness, these fibers, along with the strength of the mortar itself, help produce walls of comparable strength to conventionally laid plain masonry walls. Surface bonded walls offer the benefits of excellent dampproof coatings on each face of the wall and ease of construction.

Dry-stacked walls should be laid in an initial full mortar bed to level the first course. Level coursing is maintained by using a rubbing stone to smooth small protrusions on the block surfaces and by inserting shims every two to four courses.

Water Penetration Resistance: Protecting below grade walls from water entry involves installation of a barrier to water and water vapor. An impervious barrier on the exterior wall surface can prevent moisture entry.

The barrier is part of a comprehensive system to prevent water penetration, which includes proper wall construction and the installation of drains, gutters, and proper grading.

Building codes (refs. 2, 4 , 5, 9, 13) typically require that basement walls be dampproofed for conditions where hydrostatic pressure will not occur, and waterproofed where hydrostatic pressures may exist. Dampproofing is appropriate where groundwater drainage is good, for example where granular backfill and a subsoil drainage system are present. Hydrostatic pressure may exist due to a high water table, or due to poorly draining backfill, such as heavy clay soils. Materials used for waterproofing are generally elastic, allowing them to span small cracks and accommodate minor movements.

When choosing a waterproof or dampproof system, consideration should be given to the degree of resistance to hydrostatic head of water, absorption characteristics, elasticity, stability in moist soil, resistance to mildew and algae, impact or puncture resistance, and abrasion resistance. A complete discussion of waterproofing, dampproofing, and drainage systems is included in TEK 19-03A (ref. 6).

All dampproofing and waterproofing systems should be applied to walls that are clean and free from dirt, mud and other materials which may reduce bond between the coating and the concrete masonry wall.

Draining water away from basement walls significantly reduces the pressure the walls must resist and reduces the possibility of water infiltration into the basement if the waterproofing (or dampproofing) system fails. Perforated pipe has historically proven satisfactory when properly installed. When placed on the exterior side of basement walls, perforated pipes are usually laid in crushed stone to facilitate drainage. To prevent migration of fine soil into the drains, filter fabrics are often placed over the gravel.

Drainage pipes can also be placed beneath the slab and connected into a sump. Pipes through the footing or the wall drain water from the exterior side of the basement wall.

The drainage and waterproofing systems should always be inspected prior to backfilling to ensure they are adequately placed. Any questionable workmanship or materials should be repaired at this stage since repairs are difficult and expensive after backfilling.

Backfilling: One of the most crucial aspects of basement construction is how and when to properly backfill. Walls should be properly braced or have the first floor in place prior to backfilling. Otherwise, a wall which is designed to be supported at the top may crack or even fail from the large soil pressures. Figure 5 shows one bracing scheme which has been widely used for residential basement walls. More substantial bracing may be required for high walls or large backfill pressures.

The backfill material should be free-draining soil without large stones, construction debris, organic materials, and frozen earth. Saturated soils, especially saturated clays, should generally not be used as backfill materials since wet materials significantly increase the hydrostatic pressure on the walls.

Backfill materials should be placed in several lifts and each layer should be compacted with small mechanical tampers. Care should be taken when placing the backfill materials to avoid damaging the drainage, waterproofing or exterior insulation systems. Sliding boulders and soil down steep slopes should thus be avoided since the high impact loads generated can damage not only the drainage and waterproofing systems but the wall as well. Likewise, heavy equipment should not be operated within about 3 feet (0.9 m) of any basement wall system.

The top 4 to 8 in. (102 to 203 mm) of backfill materials should be low permeability soil so rain water is absorbed into the backfill slowly. Grade should be sloped away from the basement at least 6 in. (152 mm) within 10 feet (3.1 m) of the building. If the ground naturally slopes toward the building, a shallow swale can be installed to redirect runoff.

Construction Tolerances

Specifications for Masonry Structures (ref. 8) specifies tolerances for concrete masonry construction. These tolerances were developed to avoid structurally impairing a wall because of improper placement.

  1. Dimension of elements in cross section or elevation
    …………………………………….¼ in. (6.4 mm), +½ in. (12.7 mm)
  2. Mortar joint thickness: bed………………………..+⅛ in. (3.2 mm)
    head………………………………..-¼ in (6.4 mm), + in. (9.5 mm)
  3. Elements
    • Variation from level: bed joints……………………………………….
      ±¼ in. (6.4 mm) in 10 ft (3.1 m), ±½ in. (12.7 mm) max
      top surface of bearing walls……………………………………………..
      ±¼ in.(6.4 mm), +⅜ in.(9.5 mm), ±½ in.(12.7mm) max
    • Variation from plumb………….±¼ in. (6.4 mm) 10 ft (3.1 m)
      ………………………………………±⅜ in. (9.5 mm) in 20 ft (6.1 m)
      ……………………………………………±½ in. (12.7 mm) maximum
    • True to a line…………………..±¼ in. (6.4 mm) in 10 ft (3.1 m)
      ………………………………………±⅜ in. (9.5 mm) in 20 ft (6.1 m)
      ……………………………………………±½ in. (12.7 mm) maximum
    • Alignment of columns and bearing walls (bottom versus top)
      ……………………………………………………………..±½ in (12.7 mm)
  4. Location of elements
    • Indicated in plan……………..±½ in (12.7 mm) in 20 ft (6.1 m)
      …………………………………………….±¾ in. (19.1 mm) maximum
    • Indicated in elevation
      ……………………………………….±¼ in. (6.4 mm) in story height
      …………………………………………….±¾ in. (19.1 mm) maximum

Insulation: The thermal performance of a masonry wall depends on its R-value as well as the thermal mass of the wall. Rvalue describes the ability to resist heat flow; higher R-values give better insulating performance. The R-value is determined by the size and type of masonry unit, type and amount of insulation, and finish materials. Depending on the particular site conditions and owner’s preference, insulation may be placed on the outside of block walls, in the cores of hollow units, or on the interior of the walls.

Thermal mass describes the ability of materials like concrete masonry to store heat. Masonry walls remain warm or cool long after the heat or air-conditioning has shut off, keeping the interior comfortable. Thermal mass is most effective when insulation is placed on the exterior or in the cores of the block, where the masonry is in direct contact with the interior conditioned air.

Exterior insulated masonry walls typically use rigid board insulation adhered to the soil side of the wall. The insulation requires a protective finish where it is exposed above grade to maintain durability, integrity, and effectiveness.

Concrete masonry cores may be insulated with molded polystyrene inserts, expanded perlite or vermiculite granular fills, or foamed-in-place insulation. Inserts may be placed in the cores of conventional masonry units, or they may be used in block specifically designed to provide higher R-values.

Interior insulation typically consists of insulation installed between furring strips, finished with gypsum wall board or panelling. The insulation may be fibrous batt, rigid board, or fibrous blown-in insulation.

Design Features

Interior Finishes: Split faced, scored, burnished, and fluted block give owners and designers added options to standard block surfaces. Colored units can be used in the entire wall or in sections to achieve specific patterns.

Although construction with staggered vertical mortar joints (running bond) is standard for basement construction, the appearance of continuous vertical mortar joints (stacked bond pattern) can be achieved by using of scored units or reinforced masonry construction.

Natural Lighting: Because of the modular nature of concrete masonry, windows and window wells of a variety of shapes and sizes can be easily accommodated, giving basements warm, natural lighting. For additional protection and privacy, glass blocks can be incorporated in lieu of traditional glass windows.

References

  1. Basement Manual-Design and Construction Using Concrete Masonry, CMU-MAN-002-01, Concrete Masonry & Hardscapes Association, 2001.
  2. BOCA National Building Code. Country Club Hills, IL: Building Officials and Code Administrators International, Inc. (BOCA), 1999.
  3. Building Code Requirements for Masonry Structures, ACI 530-02/ASCE 5-02/TMS 402-02. Reported by the Masonry Standards Joint Committee, 2002.
  4. International Residential Code. Falls Church, VA: International Code Council, 2000.
  5. International Building Code. Falls Church, VA: International Code Council, 2000.
  6. Preventing Water Penetration in Below-Grade Concrete Masonry Walls, TEK 19-03A. Concrete Masonry & Hardscapes Association, 2001.
  7. Seismic Design Provisions for Masonry Structures, TEK 14-18B, Concrete Masonry & Hardscapes Association, 2009.
  8. Specifications for Masonry Structures, ACI 530.1-02/ASCE 6-99/TMS 602-02. Reported by the Masonry Standards Joint Committee, 2002.
  9. Standard Building Code. Birmingham, AL: Southern Building Code Congress International, Inc. (SBCCI), 1999.
  10. Standard Specification for Grout for Masonry, ASTM C 476-01. American Society for Testing and Materials, 2001.
  11. Standard Specification for Load-Bearing Concrete Masonry Units, ASTM C 90-01. American Society for Testing and Materials, 2001.
  12. Standard Specification for Mortar for Unit Masonry, ASTM C 270-00. American Society for Testing and Materials, 2000.
  13. Uniform Building Code. Whittier, CA: International Conference of Building Officials (ICBO), 1997.

Roles and Responsibilities on Segmental Retaining Wall Projects

INTRODUCTION

On all construction projects, including those involving segmental retaining walls (SRWs), it is the owner’s responsibility to achieve coordination between construction and design professionals that ensures all required design, engineering analysis, and inspection is provided. In many cases, a design professional such as a site civil engineer or an architect acts as the owner’s representative. In either case, the owner or owner’s representative should ensure that the engineering design professionals’ scope of work, roles and responsibilities are clearly defined so that there is no ambiguity regarding responsibility for investigation, analysis and design, and that all required testing is performed.

The roles outlined in this TEK are typical industry roles for various engineering disciplines. SRW design and construction should generally follow these traditional roles. However, these roles may vary from project to project, depending on the contractual obligations of each consultant. For example, for simpler projects, such as residential landscapes, one design professional may take on the responsibility of several roles, if acceptable to local building code requirements.

For tall or complex walls and for commercial projects, each of these roles is likely to be provided by separate firms, each with expertise in a particular discipline. The discussion in this Tech Note is generally oriented towards projects where several design professionals are contracted.

Reinforced SRWs, because of their nature as composite soil structures, may have unique design and inspection considerations for the site civil engineer, the geotechnical engineer, and the independent testing agency. These considerations are discussed in further detail in the following sections.

Detailed guidance on SRW design, construction and inspection can be found in references 1 through 3.

OVERVIEW OF ROLES

The owner/developer, or a designated representative, is ultimately responsible for ensuring that all applicable requirements of governing authorities for the permitting, design, construction and safety on the project are addressed. The owner or owners’ representative should ensure that the types of retaining walls specified are appropriate for the site conditions and ensure the wall alignment fits within the site’s space limitations. It is the owner’s or owner’s representative’s responsibility to contract an engineer to provide site civil engineering including site layout, drainage and grading. The owner must also ensure that a geotechnical engineer and testing agency are contracted to provide all necessary and required soils exploration, analysis and earthwork inspection for the entire project, including in the vicinity of the SRWs, just as they do in the vicinity of building structures. The owner or owner’s representative must also ensure that a qualified wall design engineer provides an SRW structural design.

The most straightforward means for the owner or owner’s representative to ensure all engineering roles are well-defined is for the SRW design engineer’s assigned roles to be the same as those traditionally given to a structural engineer designing a cast-in-place concrete retaining wall, and for the other design professionals, such as site civil and geotechnical engineers, to also provide the same roles and services as they would for a cast-in-place retaining wall.

Table 1 contains an itemized list of the suggested roles for each professional discipline for larger walls and commercial projects involving SRWs. A more thorough explanation of the site civil engineer’s, geotechnical engineer’s and SRW engineer’s roles, and construction observation and testing roles is provided in the following sections. The actual responsibilities for each discipline should be contractually based.

SITE CIVIL ENGINEER SUGGESTED ROLES OVERVIEW

It is suggested that the site civil engineer be contracted for all traditional site civil duties, including the design of surface drainage, storm drainage collection structures, utility layout, erosion control and scour protection. The site civil engineer is also typically responsible for site layout and grading plans, including slopes and retaining wall locations. The site civil engineer should, in consultation with the geotechnical engineer, ensure that all planned grades, including those at the top and bottom of SRWs, do not exceed the stable slope angles and do not cause surface drainage or erosion problems.

The site civil engineer should also plan the wall alignment so that the SRW structure does not encroach on any easements. In addition, the site civil engineer should be responsible for any other issues related to the wall location, such as proximity to property lines, utilities, watersheds, wetlands, or any other easements. In some cases, the site civil engineer may also act as the SRW Design Engineer and take on suggested roles for the SRW Engineer discussed below.

The site civil engineer should evaluate and design for any hydrologic issues and structures such as: culverts, open channels, detention/retention ponds, scour and erosion control details, as well as defining high water levels, flow volumes, flood areas and scour depths. The site civil engineer should provide any pertinent hydrologic data that may affect the SRW to the SRW engineer.

Often, when not designing the SRW in-house, the site civil engineer specifies the engineering design of SRWs to be part of the SRW construction contract (a design/build bid). While a common practice, this type of bid can place the SRW engineer in a different position than other project engineers. Unlike other engineers working directly for the owner, the SRW engineer in this design/build case is often working directly for a contractor, who is often a subcontractor to other contractors. This can cause design coordination issues because the SRW engineer may not be included in project discussions with other engineers, such as pre-construction meetings. Therefore, it is suggested that the site civil first determine if it is appropriate to have the SRW engineering specified as part of the wall construction contract. For some more complicated projects, it may be preferable to have the SRW design engineer perform the design prior to bidding the construction rather than as part of a design/build bid. If the site civil engineer chooses to specify the SRW design as part of the construction bid, it is recommended that the site civil engineer ensure that the SRW design engineer is involved in any required design and construction observation services before and during construction, similar to the way geotechnical engineers are often contracted for their services during construction.

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER SUGGESTED ROLES OVERVIEW

The geotechnical engineer should typically be contracted to provide the same engineering roles in the vicinity of the SRW as they do for all other structures on site. The geotechnical engineer’s typical roles are the investigation, analysis and testing of the site soil materials and groundwater conditions. Just as geotechnical engineers traditionally provide bearing capacity, settlement estimates and slope stability analysis for building structures, it is suggested they do the same for SRWs. The geotechnical engineer’s role should include providing soil properties such as soil shear strength parameters, ground water elevation, seismic conditions, and bearing capacities to the SRW engineer.

Responsibility for slope stability evaluation around an SRW can be a source of confusion, because the SRW engineer can often address slope stability issues near a geosynthetic-reinforced SRW by modifying the geosynthetic reinforcement layout. Thus, the SRW engineer is sometimes requested to evaluate and design for slope stability by the civil engineer’s specifications. However, involving the SRW engineer in addressing slope stability should not remove ultimate global/slope stability responsibility from the geotechnical engineer.

It is therefore suggested that, regardless of the SRW engineer’s involvement, the geotechnical engineer be contracted to have the ultimate responsibility for the site’s slope stability, including: determining when and where global stability analyses are required, determining the appropriate soils and groundwater properties to be used for the analyses, and ensuring that all required failure planes are analyzed. While the geotechnical engineer may need to coordinate with the SRW engineer for evaluating potential failure planes that pass through the reinforced soil (compound failures), the geotechnical engineer has the primary responsibility for these analyses.

When the geotechnical consultant is retained to provide construction observation and soils testing for a project, the contract should include inspection and testing of SRW earthwork along with all other earthwork on site. See TEC-008-12, Inspection Guide for Segmental Retaining Walls (ref. 3) for further discussion of inspection roles.

While geotechnical engineers should be contracted for the same traditional roles regarding SRWs as for other structures, the soils engineering for SRWs may require some slightly different methods of analysis compared to evaluating soils below rigid structures on spread footings. Design guidelines for SRWs are provided in Reference 1.

SRW DESIGN ENGINEER SUGGESTED ROLES OVERVIEW

As noted previously, the SRW design engineer should serve the same roles for SRWs as a structural engineer would for the design of a cast-in-place concrete retaining wall. In some cases, the site civil engineering firm may also act as the SRW engineer, while in others, the SRW design engineer will be a separate firm. The SRW design engineer should design a stable SRW, given the specified wall geometry and site conditions provided by the site civil and geotechnical engineers. The SRW engineer’s duties typically include determining the SRW’s maximum stable unreinforced height and providing a geosynthetic reinforcement layout design when required.

The SRW design engineer is typically responsible for preparing the SRW construction drawings, and for determining the internal stability, facial stability of the SRW units, internal drainage of the SRW (both at the face of the wall and at the rear of the reinforced soil mass, if required), external stability (sliding and overturning), and internal compound stability.

The SRW designer engineer’s output generally consists of specifications of wall components, a wall elevation detail, typical cross sections, details for any required drainage materials within or just behind the wall system, and details for how to incorporate any other structures (utilities, pipe penetrations, posts, etc.), if feasible, within the reinforced zone and wall face.

The SRW design engineer should typically not assume any duties typically relegated to the geotechnical engineer elsewhere on site. While an SRW engineer may be asked to participate in addressing the slope stability immediately around the SRW or foundation improvements in the soil below an SRW, it is recommended that the geotechnical engineer be clearly contracted to have ultimate responsibility for all slope stability and bearing capacity/settlement concerns on site, including those below and around SRWs.

It is appropriate that the SRW engineer be contracted to provide services during construction, especially on larger projects, but it is recommended that these not be included in a design/build contract for the wall construction. Time lag between design and construction can make it impractical to expect the designer to be available for services during construction and, given the often unpredictable extent and timing of construction, it is inappropriate to have services during construction be in a lump-sum design/build contract. Rather, it is suggested that the SRW engineer be hired under a separate contract directly with the owner or owner’s representative to provide services during construction. These services may include preconstruction correspondences and meetings, review of materials submittals, review of earthwork testing performed by the geotechnical engineer, and review of the wall contractor’s building practices.

CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION AND TESTING SUGGESTED ROLES OVERVIEW

The soil in the reinforced zone should be checked to ensure it meets specifications; just as concrete and steel are inspected in a cast-in-place concrete retaining wall.

The wall contractor is responsible for quality control of the wall installation: performing necessary observation and testing to verify that the work performed meets minimum standards.

It is the owner’s or owner’s representative’s responsibility to perform quality assurance: auditing and verifying that the quality control program is being performed properly.

Just as is done for building structures and cast-in-place concrete retaining walls, foundation and retained soils should be evaluated for consistency with the soil properties used in the design. Generally, the geotechnical engineer evaluates the onsite soil conditions and performs earthwork testing. It is suggested that the geotechnical engineer perform any field and laboratory testing they deem required to verify soil conditions. The geotechnical engineer should confer with the SRW engineer regarding the reinforced soil specifications and provide the SRW engineer with the fill soil test results. The geotechnical engineer should also determine the frequency of tests required to ensure that compaction of the SRW reinforced fill meets the project specifications.

OWNER SUGGESTED ROLES OVERVIEW

Segmental retaining walls are designed to provide a long life with little to no maintenance required. After the SRW installation is complete, some very basic maintenance will help maximize the SRW project’s beauty and durability.

The most basic maintenance task is a periodic visual assessment of the SRW units and overall wall. If coatings have been applied to the wall, the need for re-coating should be assessed based on the coating manufacturer’s recommendations and the exposure conditions of the wall. Table 2 lists regular inspection tasks that can be performed on SRWs and their suggested frequency.

Periodic cleaning of SRWs may be desired to maintain the wall’s aesthetics. Cleaning recommendations for SRWs are essentially the same as those for other concrete masonry walls. The reader is referred to: TEK 8-04A, Cleaning Concrete Masonry; TEK 08-02A, Removal of Stains from Concrete Masonry; and TEK 08-03A, Control and Removal of Efflorescence (refs. 5, 6, 7), for more detailed guidance.

In addition to maintenance and cleaning, the owner is also responsible for ensuring that subsequent digging or trenching, such as for landscaping, does not impact the SRW installation. During any excavation, care should be taken to leave a zone of undisturbed soil behind the segmental retaining wall. Particular care should be taken to ensure that excavation does not damage, cut or remove the geosynthetic soil reinforcement, if present. For this reason, the owner should maintain a record of the installation, including the locations of geosynthetic reinforcement.

Once established, tree roots do not typically damage an SRW. The roots will typically not damage the wall face from behind because the drainage aggregate behind the SRW face does not support root growth. In fact, the root system can act as additional soil reinforcement, helping to further stabilize the soil. When newly planted, trees and other large vegetation should be adequately supported to prevent them from toppling and potentially damaging the SRW.

REFERENCES

  1. Design Manual for Segmental Retaining Walls, Third Edition, SRW-MAN-001-10, Concrete Masonry & Hardscapes Association, 2010.
  2. Segmental Retaining Wall Installation Guide, SRWMAN-003-10, Concrete Masonry & Hardscapes Association, 2010. 
  3. Inspection Guide for Segmental Retaining Walls, SRW-TEC-008-12, Concrete Masonry & Hardscapes Association, 2012. 
  4. Maintenance of Concrete Masonry Walls, TEK 08-01A, Concrete Masonry & Hardscapes Association, 2004. 
  5. Cleaning Concrete Masonry, TEK 08-04A, Concrete Masonry & Hardscapes Association, 2005.
  6. Removal of Stains from Concrete Masonry, TEK 08-02A, Concrete Masonry & Hardscapes Association, 1998.
  7. Control and Removal of Efflorescence, TEK 08-03A, Concrete Masonry & Hardscapes Association, 2003.

Construction of Reinforced Concrete Masonry Diaphragm Walls

INTRODUCTION

Diaphragm walls are composed of two wythes of masonry with a large cavity or void. The wythes are bonded together with masonry ribs or crosswalls in such a way that, structurally, the wythes function compositely—as though the entire thickness is effectively solid.

Figure 1 shows a stone-clad university building with reinforced concrete masonry diaphragm walls, used to recreate the campus’ Gothic architecture. The use of reinforced diaphragm walls allowed support of the tall sidewalls and gable ends.

Figure 2 shows a cross-section of a typical diaphragm wall. The reinforced wythes can be fully or partially grouted. The exterior face can be constructed with a weathering face, like a conventional single wythe wall, or finished with a veneer. The voids can be used for placement of utilities and/or insulation.

This TEK discusses construction considerations for diaphragm walls: TEK 14-24, Design of Reinforced Concrete Masonry Diaphragm Walls, (ref. 1) covers the structural design.

CONSTRUCTION ADVANTAGES

Reinforced diaphragm walls present several construction benefits. These include:

  1. As shown in Figure 1, thick walls can be created efficiently using standard units bonded together. Thicker walls can be used to create taller walls.
  2. The wall can have exposed finished surfaces both inside and out. In addition, those finishes can be different because they are created by two different masonry wythes and can, therefore, feature different unit types/sizes/colors.
  3. The wall construction proceeds very much as conventional single wythe or cavity wall construction.
  4. The exterior wythe can be constructed with a veneer.
  5. The large interior voids allow for easy placement of utilities and/or insulation.

KEY CONSTRUCTION FEATURES

Construction Sequence

The construction sequence for diaphragm walls can vary based upon how the ribs are interconnected with the two wythes. Building Code Requirements for Masonry Structures (ref. 2), referred to as TMS 402, Section 5.1.1.2.5 provides three methods for connecting intersecting walls to allow shear transfer:

  1. At least fifty percent of the masonry units at the interface must interlock. This means the ribs could be constructed in running bond with every other course interlocking with the wythes. Thus, the wythes and the ribs would be constructed concurrently.
  2. Walls must be anchored by steel connectors grouted into the wall and meeting the following requirements: (a) Minimum size: 1/4 in. x 1-1/2 in. x 28 in. (6.4 x 38.1 x 711 mm) including 2-in. (50.8-mm) long, 90-degree bend at each end to form a U or Z-shape. (b) Maximum spacing: 48 in. (1,219 mm). Thus, it is possible to build the ribs separately from the wythes, which provides significant flexibility in construction.
  3. Intersecting reinforced bond beams must be provided at a maximum spacing of 48 in. (1,219 mm) on center. The area of reinforcement in each bond beam must be not less than 0.1 in.2 per ft (211 mm2/m) multiplied by the vertical spacing of the bond beams in feet (meters). Reinforcement must be developed on each side of the intersection.

Again, this provides flexibility in sequencing the wall construction. However, the grouting must be done simultaneously with the wythe construction.

Masonry Bond

TMS 402 Section 5.1.1.2.1 requires that the masonry at intersecting walls be laid in running bond for composite action between wythes to be effective. This requirement controls the entire construction of a diaphragm wall and mandates running bond for both the wythes and the ribs.

Reinforcement

Vertical reinforcement is typically placed in the cells of the wythes as is done in single-wythe construction. Posttensioning can be placed either in the cells of the wythes or within the void itself. If placed within the void and laterally restrained tendons are specified, tendon restraints must be fabricated. TEK 03-14, Post-Tensioned Concrete Masonry Wall Construction (ref. 3) provides a more detailed overview. Depending on the project’s seismic and/or loading requirements, horizontal reinforcement can be placed in either grouted bond beams or in the bed joints of the wythes and ribs. Horizontal bond beams are beneficial in that they can also serve as the interlock between the ribs and wythes, as well as shear reinforcement for the ribs.

Ribs (Crosswalls)

The structural design will determine whether or not the ribs require vertical reinforcement. The interlock with the wythes transfers shear forces across the intersections, and the vertical reinforcement in the wythes acts as the total wall reinforcement.

Wall Grouting

The requirement for full or partial wall grouting is a design decision. Any cells or bond beams with reinforcement must be grouted. The need for additional grouting is determined based on the design requirements. Both low-lift and high-lift grouting techniques are suitable to diaphragm walls. See TEK 03-02A, Grouting Concrete Masonry Walls, (ref. 4) for more detailed information.

Water Management

Strategies for water penetration resistance of conventional masonry walls depend on whether the wall is singlewythe or a cavity wall. Water penetration resistance for the exterior wythe of a diaphragm wall follows the strategies employed for single wythe construction. If the exterior wythe has a veneer and cavity, it is flashed and weeped the same way as a single wythe masonry cavity wall. With no veneer and cavity, the exterior wythe of a diaphragm wall is flashed and weeped the same way as a similarly constructed partially grouted single wythe wall. Flashing and weeps are not necessary if the exterior wythe is solid grouted.

Figure 3 shows a typical wall base detail for a diaphragm wall with an exterior veneer and cavity. The cavity between the exterior diaphragm wythe may contain insulation and an air/moisture barrier, as required. The veneer is anchored to the exterior wythe of the diaphragm wall and is weeped and flashed. TEK 19-05A, Flashing Details for Concrete Masonry Walls, (ref. 6) provides additional details applicable to this construction.

Figure 4 shows a wall base detail applicable to an exterior diaphragm wythe without a cavity and veneer. TEK 19-02B, Design for Dry Single Wythe Concrete Masonry Walls, (ref. 7) provides additional details for single wythe construction.

Openings through diaphragm walls, roof/floor intersections, etc. are also flashed and weeped similar to conventional concrete masonry walls.

Top of the Wall

Diaphragm walls require closure at the top to transfer vertical loads and close off the void. Figure 5 shows one common detail for capping the walls. The cast-in-place capping slab at the top takes the place of what would normally be bond beams in single-wythe walls. For post tensioned walls, the top slab provides a convenient anchorage point for the tendons.

Utilities and Insulation

The voids offer several opportunities not common in masonry walls. They provide chases for duct work and utilities with minimal cutting of the units and allow for additional insulation if desired. Diaphragm walls can be insulated on the exterior, by using a veneer and insulated cavity, or by using an exterior insulation system. They can also be insulated on the interior, using furring, insulation and gypsum wallboard. When insulation is placed in the voids, however, the ribs produce a large thermal bridge, reducing the effectiveness of the insulation. 06-11A, Insulating Concrete Masonry Walls, (ref. 5) provides more detailed information.

Openings

Constructing openings in diaphragm walls is also very similar to single-wythe walls (see Figure 6). The entire void should be spanned/filled at the opening and the exterior wythe flashed above (as appropriate), as shown in Figure 4. Figure 6 Option 1 shows a reinforced concrete slab that has been designed as a header for the opening. Figure 6 Option 2 has lintels to support the wythes over the opening. The void at the headers and sills is infilled with a nonmasonry material, such as exterior gypsum sheathing. The jambs should be infilled with masonry wherever they don’t already align with the ribs. Note that Figure 6 does not show flashing that may be necessary.

Control Joints

Control joints are provided in concrete masonry walls to control cracking primarily from movement due to shrinkage and thermal effects. In diaphragm walls, the ribs will tend to restrict some of that movement, however, because there is currently no research to quantify these effects, current practice is to place control joints at intervals based upon CMU-TEC-009-23, Crack Control Strategies for Concrete Masonry Construction, (ref. 8). TEK 14-24 discusses these criteria and provides an example for determining control joint spacing for a diaphragm wall.

Although the inner wythe will generally be exposed principally to shrinkage with only minor thermal effects, it is common to place control joints in the same locations and to provide similar shrinkage reinforcement in both wythes.

Figure 7 shows two methods of creating control joints in a diaphragm wall. Option 1, with ribs on both sides of the control joint, does a better job keeping water out of the void than Option 2 because a failure of the sealant would allow water to penetrate between the ribs, rather than into the void itself. The control joints in both wythes should be sealed for water protection.

CMU-TEC-009-23 contains additional control joint constructions/details that can also be used on diaphragm walls, including fire-rated joints and control joints that allow shear transfer.

SUMMARY

Diaphragm walls provide several beneficial features and are applicable to a wide variety of projects. Constructing reinforced concrete masonry diaphragm walls uses methods and techniques commonly known to most masons. The added thickness of the wall provides some variations in the overall reinforcement and layout concepts but the techniques are typical for masonry.

REFERENCES

  1. Design of Reinforced Concrete Masonry Diaphragm Walls, TEK 14-24. Concrete Masonry & Hardscapes Association, 2014.
  2. Building Code Requirements for Masonry Structures, TMS 402-16, Reported by The Masonry Society 2016.
  3. Post-Tensioned Concrete Masonry Wall Construction, TEK 03-14. Concrete Masonry & Hardscapes Association, 2002.
  4. Grouting Concrete Masonry Walls, TEK 03-2A. Concrete Masonry & Hardscapes Association, 2005.
  5. Insulating Concrete Masonry Walls, TEK 06-11A. Concrete Masonry & Hardscapes Association, 2010.
  6. Flashing Details for Concrete Masonry Walls, TEK 19-05A.
    Concrete Masonry & Hardscapes Association, 2008.
  7. Design for Dry Single Wythe Concrete Masonry Walls, TEK 19-02B. Concrete Masonry & Hardscapes Association, 2012.
  8. Crack Control Strategies for Concrete Masonry Construction, CMU-TEC-009-23, Concrete Masonry & Hardscapes Association, 2023.